Skip to content
Malware

Microsoft Teams Vishing Attack Uses Quick Assist to Deploy GoGRPC Backdoor

A new Microsoft Teams vishing campaign is using fake IT support calls to gain remote access to corporate systems. The attackers then deploy GoGRPC, a Go-based backdoor that can run commands, collect system details, and maintain access to compromised devices. The activity appears linked to a threat a...

· Jul 28, 2026 · 5 min read · 👁 0 views
Microsoft Teams Vishing Attack Uses Quick Assist to Deploy GoGRPC Backdoor

A new Microsoft Teams vishing campaign is using fake IT support calls to gain remote access to corporate systems.

The attackers then deploy GoGRPC, a Go-based backdoor that can run commands, collect system details, and maintain access to compromised devices.

The activity appears linked to a threat actor that may serve as an initial access broker for ransomware operations.

Its methods combine inbox flooding, Microsoft Teams impersonation, and Quick Assist sessions to pressure employees into trusting fraudulent support requests.

Analysts at Zscaler identified the campaign while tracking activity from January through June 2026.

Zscaler said in a report shared with Cyber Security News (CSN) that the group has steadily expanded its toolset and increasingly focused on corporate targets.

The campaign is a reminder that remote support tools can become a serious entry point when users are manipulated into approving access.

High-level campaign attack flow and associated tooling for GoGRPC (Source - Zscaler)
High-level campaign attack flow and associated tooling for GoGRPC (Source – Zscaler)

Similar Microsoft Teams support call attacks have shown how quickly a convincing helpdesk impersonation can turn into a wider network security incident.

Microsoft Teams Vishing Attack Deploy GoGRPC Backdoor

The attack often begins with spam bombing, where a victim’s inbox is flooded with unwanted messages. While the employee is distracted, an attacker contacts them through Microsoft Teams and claims to be from the organization’s IT helpdesk.

The caller attempts to persuade the target to open a Quick Assist link and approve a remote support session.

Once access is granted, the attacker can interact with the device and launch PowerShell commands to download additional payloads.

Function trees for GoGRPC backdoor variants (Source - Zscaler)
Function trees for GoGRPC backdoor variants (Source – Zscaler)

This approach abuses trust rather than relying on a software flaw. Employees facing unexpected technical problems may be more likely to accept help, especially when the attacker appears to know their name, workplace, or recent inbox issue.

Organizations should require employees to verify unexpected support requests through a known internal channel before starting a remote session.

Restricting external Teams communications and limiting Quick Assist use to approved IT staff can also reduce exposure to fake IT support calls.

GoGRPC and Expanding Toolset

After the Quick Assist session is established, the attackers use PowerShell to download and execute GoGRPC. The malware creates persistence through a Windows Registry Run value, allowing it to launch again when a user signs in.

Researchers identified four GoGRPC variants named Lep, Giver, Pet, and Kind. They share core backdoor functions but differ in their use of encryption, code obfuscation, victim fingerprinting, and command execution features.

Communication protocol used by BlindDoor (Source - Zscaler)
Communication protocol used by BlindDoor (Source – Zscaler)

GoGRPC communicates with its command-and-control infrastructure through gRPC over HTTP/2, usually on port 443. Later Pet and Kind variants added TLS support, which can make malicious traffic less obvious among normal encrypted web connections.

The backdoor gathers information such as computer name, username, domain details, Windows version, and security software data.

It can then receive commands to run discovery tasks, helping attackers assess whether the victim’s environment is valuable for further intrusion.

The operation has also used BlindDoor, RevSocket, PyGRPC, S3Siphon, and RSOX.

These tools provide capabilities ranging from remote command execution and network tunneling to data theft, increasing the risk that initial access could lead to extortion or ransomware deployment.

Security teams should watch for suspicious PowerShell activity, unauthorized Registry Run entries, unexpected remote support sessions, and unusual outbound gRPC or WebSocket connections.

Monitoring practices described in coverage of PowerShell backdoor delivery tactics can help investigators spot similar staging behavior.

Employees should treat unsolicited Teams messages, calls, and Quick Assist requests as suspicious, even when they appear to come from IT.

Organizations should also prepare incident-response procedures because an early warning may prevent the type of follow-on ransomware activity seen in recent ransomware access operations.

Indicators of Compromise (IoCs):-

TypeIndicatorDescription
SHA-25666b2b22397cea219266afb8cbbb28fe93997c1444f642a183ac8fc9ca1fabed5Giver backdoor
SHA-2569136ffb749c6cec13b826cd4f25ffdcf170375889feba9fee28dd74c32578f52Lep backdoor
SHA-2567dcabb6d07d52b92bbf8d659d1ed373fa780e7839fd3d744826a56fc1cd2372fGiver backdoor
SHA-25635ea50f16bd5c080c91dbaa3dd4937408ed9563c1d9aa1cd0c751ae58db0eedcPet backdoor with TLS
SHA-256759287052b8cc4f4ce16065857cbc9dba72aab218e709d3419483a95092c6f96Pet backdoor with TLS
SHA-256f36bfccf944b5d1e5e306958c1a728e38786c042ee4e536cc44c9d43940b1121Kind backdoor with TLS
SHA-25651edd14233483bcf36e0b0f31451f28eac681fe3f2036f76c02b7ec1bb17ce33Kind backdoor with TLS
SHA-2565d53246b0e6b681bc624739a7bead39a61fb07c0f4474b8170112e829c053f85RevSocket
SHA-25665af5c3ba2d00967b25b9165d2d3171fa81f209ee0790299805bb907d492a670PyGRPC and reconnaissance tool
SHA-25641748648b71a70431123ec48e38868ff8aad3a7a06f5d781c2d2a4f718e7fd91MSI file dropping RSOX
SHA-256f85960dee17ba587b712cd8cdf89042bcd6ba711c3d5d548bef7c7f0988413f5RSOX
Domainscansec-upd.comC2 server deploying tools
Domainre2.filesdwnload.topC2 server deploying tools, April activity
Domainre8.dowlfles.onlineC2 server deploying tools, May activity
Domainupdate19.upldf.onlineC2 server deploying tools, June activity
IP address5.253.59.222Lep C2 server
IP address94.140.114.192Giver C2 server
IP address193.29.57.37Pet C2 server
IP address45.86.162.228Kind C2 server, June activity
IP address46.30.191.126RevSocket C2 server, May activity
IP address46.30.191.60RevSocket C2 server, June activity
IP address185.82.126.91S3Siphon C2 server, January activity
Domainxeds.geranteeg.onlineRSOX C2 server, June activity

Note: IP addresses and domains are intentionally defanged (e.g., [.]) to prevent accidental resolution or hyperlinking. Re-fang only within controlled threat intelligence platforms such as MISP, VirusTotal, or your SIEM.

Source: CybersecurityNews.com

Follow ShomoySoft for more: Follow on Facebook

💬 Comments (0)

Login to join the discussion.

No comments yet. Be the first!

Related Articles

Recommended for you